| |
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 163 |
| |
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| |
|
| 6.1 |
This part of the plan concerns itself with policies for the conservation
of the Borough's historic heritage. It includes policies dealing with
the protection of areas and buildings of archaeological and historic
importance and includes villages and suburban areas, as well as the
historic core zone of Shrewsbury. Policies relate primarily to the
built fabric; policies for the protection of the countryside, landscape
and wildlife are contained in the Tourism,
Leisure and Recreation Chapter of the plan. |
| 6.2 |
The historic heritage of the Borough is one of its greatest assets
and contributes to the attraction of the Borough as a centre for tourism,
leisure and employment. |
| 6.3 |
Centred on the county town of Shrewsbury, the Borough contains
some 2,400 Listed Buildings (1,875 entries), including 39 Grade I
and 159 Grade II*. There are 17 designated Conservation Areas, six
within Shrewsbury itself and the remainder dispersed in villages throughout
the rural area. |
| 6.4 |
The Borough contains 86 sites which are Scheduled Ancient Monuments,
including the Roman town of Viriconium, one of the largest cities
in Roman Britain, the mediaeval town walls of Shrewsbury, and the
two ruined Abbeys of Haughmond and Buildwas. Ranging from the pre-history
of the Upper Severn valley to the decline of Roman Viriconium and
the subsequent growth of Shrewsbury, the Borough has a complex archaeological
resource which contributes to the study of the past and an understanding
of the development and growth of urban centres in the country. Shrewsbury
is one of 30 towns chosen by English Heritage for a national programme
designed to improve the management of the 'urban archaeological resource'. |
| 6.5 |
The importance of pro-active conservation methods and their role
in urban regeneration has been realised in recent years. Conservation
programmes aimed at the repair and enhancement of historic buildings
and areas can have a significant impact in attracting additional public
sector funding and substantial private investment. |
| |
|
| |
National Guidance |
| 6.6 |
The national framework and guidance for matters concerning Listed
Buildings and Conservation Areas is provided by Planning Policy Guidance
Note 15 'Planning and the Historic Environment'. This provides detailed
guidance on issues ranging from the protection of Listed Buildings
and Conservation Areas to the repair of historic buildings. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 164 |
| |
|
| 6.7 |
Although Planning Permission may be required for works affecting
Listed Buildings and buildings in Conservation Areas, there are by
virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation
Areas) Act 1990 additional controls operating in respect of Listed
Buildings and Buildings in Conservation Areas. |
| 6.8 |
National guidance on archaeology is provided by Planning Policy
Guidance Note 16 'Planning and Archaeology'. The guidance emphasises
the importance of archaeology as a non-renewable resource and that
it is best protected by being left in situ. Where development is essential
the guidance note emphasises the importance of allowing for archaeological
recording. |
| 6.9 |
Government guidance in PPG15 and PPG16 confirms the importance
of considering economic factors as well as the need to protect the
historic environment. Successful conservation allows for change as
well as protection. The emphasis is on controlled and positive management
of change. |
| 6.10 |
National Guidance is issued on behalf of the Secretary of State
by English Heritage in the form of guidance notes such as 'Conservation
Area Practice' published in 1995. |
| |
|
| |
Regional Guidance |
| 6.11 |
The Regional Guidance for the West Midlands recognises the importance
of preserving the regions rich and varied heritage. Development should
therefore be sensitively designed and located and respect local distinctiveness,
stressing that Local authorities should set out policies for the protection
and enhancement of Listed Buildings, Conservation Areas and archaeological
areas in accordance with PPG15 and PPG16. |
| |
|
| |
Strategic Guidance |
| 6.12 |
At the County level, the Structure Plan Policies 2/22 and 2/23 seek
to preserve and enhance Listed Buildings and/or Ancient Monuments.
Policy 2/25 sets out the framework for Conservation Area policies.
Policy 2/25A makes specific reference to policies for the conservation
of Shrewsbury. Policy 2/26 seeks to protect, conserve and record archaeological
sites and Policy 2/27 sets out the County Council priorities. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 165 |
| |
|
| |
Objectives |
| 6.13 |
Policies in this Plan have several overall aims, which have been
summarised in the Introduction chapter.
In this section, the Council's method of achieving the overall aims
may be summarised in the following objectives:- |
| |
· To protect and enhance Scheduled Ancient Monuments and sites of
archaeological importance with a strong emphasis for preservation
in situ. |
| |
· To ensure that areas of archaeological potential are properly
evaluated and that where preservation in situ is not warranted, there
is proper recording. |
| |
· To protect and enhance the buildings on the Statutory List of
Buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest within the
Borough, and to promote policies for their repair and protection from
unsympathetic alteration or development. |
| |
· To preserve and enhance Conservation Areas through the control
of development, by promoting schemes for the repair of buildings and
for the enhancement of spaces between buildings. |
| |
· To preserve and enhance important historic landscapes including
former mining areas, historic parks and gardens and battlefields.
|
| |
· To promote good design in new development throughout the Borough
and to protect the form and skyline of Shrewsbury and other settlements.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 166 |
| |
|
| PLANNING PERMISSION WILL ONLY BE GRANTED
FOR EXTENSIONS TO OR ALTERATION OF CHURCHES AND
CHAPELS WHERE SUCH DEVELOPMENT IS SEEN TO PRESERVE
OR ENHANCE THE HISTORIC FABRIC OF A CHURCH OR CHAPEL.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.14 |
In those cases where ecclesiastical exemption applies, the Council
will still expect work to be carried out in accordance with the guidelines
for all Listed Buildings and to respect the character and integrity
of the building. Church buildings form an important part of the architectural
history and the built environment of the Borough. Seventy-one church
or chapel buildings are included in the Statutory List of Buildings
of Special Architectural and Historic Interest in the Borough. Many
of these are exceptionally fine buildings whose demolition or deterioration
would be damaging to the image of the Borough. The Council has a role
in providing advice on the work carried out to churches and assisting
the Church Authorities to maximise the grant aid that they can attract
towards the repair of church buildings. |
| 6.15 |
The regulations exempt listed churches of certain denominations
from the need to apply for Listed Building Consent. Proposed works
to such buildings are considered by the appropriate church's Advisory
Committee which takes into account the architectural and historic
issues. Planning permission may still be required for alterations
or extensions. |
| 6.16 |
Financial assistance towards the cost of structural repairs to
Grade I and II* Listed Churches is currently available under the Historic
Buildings and Ancient Monuments Act 1953. The Council will continue
to offer assistance in obtaining grants from English Heritage and
any other relevant sources for the repair of church buildings. |
| HE2 PROTECTION OF
ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS |
| THE COUNCIL WILL PROTECT SITES OF
KNOWN OR SUSPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE AND
WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE THAT:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 167 |
| |
|
| (i) |
The archaeological impact and implications of
proposals are assessed by a professionally qualified
archaeological organisation or consultant at an
early stage and this assessment is submitted as
part of the planning application; |
| (ii) |
Important archaeological remains and their settings
are permanently preserved in situ and displayed
to the public where possible; |
| (iii) |
Where in situ preservation is neither feasible
nor warranted, applicants must secure the implementation
of an agreed programme of archaeological investigation,
including provision for on-site excavation and recording,
post excavation work, and publication and curation
of the archive, before any works take place on site;
|
| (iv) |
Where a programme of on-site excavation and recording,
leading to post-excavation work, publication and
curation of the archive is deemed necessary, applicants
will be encouraged to enter into voluntary management
agreements which will provide for appropriate and
satisfactory provision for the excavation and recording
of remains. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.17 |
The Borough Council will consult the County Sites and Monuments
Record (SMR), held by Shropshire County Council, and will also seek
advice, when appropriate, from the County Archaeologist and from archaeologists
at English Heritage to ensure that archaeological evidence both above
ground and below ground is properly identified, recorded and protected.
|
| 6.18 |
Archaeological remains are irreplaceable evidence of our society's
past development, which are valuable not only for their own sake,
but also for their role in education, leisure and tourism. Remains
are a finite, non-renewable resource, vulnerable to damage and destruction
and great care is needed to ensure their survival. Government advice
contained in PPG16 advises that preservation in situ of important
archaeological remains is always to be preferred. |
| 6.19 |
The collection and management of archaeological information is
essential in formulating policies for the archaeological resource
and its future protection. The County Council Sites and Monuments
Record (SMR) is the Borough wide inventory of known archaeological
sites within the Borough. For Shrewsbury town centre, the Shrewsbury
Urban Archaeological Database has been integrated into the Sites and
Monuments Record and will give a comprehensive overview of the archaeological
constraints on development within the historic core of Shrewsbury.
The County Council also maintain a Shrewsbury Urban Archaeological
Database which will be utilised where appropriate. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 168 |
| |
|
| 6.20 |
The needs of archaeology and development can be reconciled and
potential conflict very much reduced, if developers discuss preliminary
plans for development with the Planning Authority at an early stage.
The first step will be to contact the holder of the SMR, who can provide
information about locations where archaeological remains are known
or thought likely to exist, enabling assessment of the archaeological
sensitivity of a site. |
| 6.21 |
In appropriate cases, the management, display and enhancement of
sites will be promoted. |
| 6.22 |
The Council recognises the value of archaeological surveys to the
planning process such as the Central Marches Historic Towns Survey,
the Shrewsbury Urban Archaeological Database, the North West Wetlands
Survey and the Wroxeter Hinterland Project. |
| |
|
| HE3 THE PROTECTION
OF NATIONALLY IMPORTANT MONUMENTS |
| PLANNING PERMISSION WILL NOT BE GRANTED
FOR DEVELOPMENTS WHICH WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE SITE OR SETTING OF A SCHEDULED ANCIENT MONUMENT,
OR OTHER NATIONALLY IMPORTANT SITES OR MONUMENTS.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.23 |
The basic means of protecting nationally important Scheduled Ancient
Monuments is through their inclusion in the statutory list of Scheduled
Ancient Monuments issued by the Secretary of State on the advice of
the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission (English Heritage).
The Secretary of State for, Culture, Media and Sport with expert advice
from English Heritage, deals with all applications for Scheduled Monument
Consent. This is required for any work which would affect a Scheduled
Ancient Monument, unless it falls within one of the specified categories
exempted under the 'Ancient Monument (Class Consents) Order 1994'.
The grant of Scheduled Monument Consent does not remove the need to
obtain planning permission or vice versa. The existing Scheduled Ancient
Monuments are shown on the proposals map and during the plan period,
further sites may be identified as suitable for scheduling. The County
Council also maintain a Shrewsbury Archaeological Database which will
be utilised where appropriate. Where non-scheduled sites of nationally
important ancient monuments are the subject of development proposals,
the Council will follow the guidance given in Planning Policy Guidance
Note 16 (Planning and Archaeology) |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 169 |
| |
|
| 6.24 |
Where archaeological research indicates that there are important
above ground or below ground archaeological structures or monuments
which make a significant contribution to the cultural heritage of
the Borough, the Borough Council will seek the advice of English Heritage
on whether they would recommend to the Secretary of State for the
Department of Culture, Media and Sport their inclusion on the list
of Scheduled Ancient Monuments. The Borough Council acknowledges that
there is always a presumption in favour of the preservation of ancient
monuments |
| |
|
| |
Listed Buildings |
| 6.25 |
Listed Buildings are vitally important to our national identity
and form a central part of our cultural heritage. They provide an
irreplaceable record which helps to inform our understanding of both
the past and present. Once lost, individual Listed Buildings which
form the essential part of historic areas cannot be replaced. Listed
Buildings also contribute to the economic well-being of the Borough
by attracting tourism and providing floor space for businesses. The
continued repair and maintenance of Listed Buildings creates a demand
for craft skills which helps to train and keep a pool of skilled labour
in the Borough. Government guidance contained in PPG15 emphasises
the contribution that historic buildings can give to the economy of
an area. |
| 6.26 |
Whilst the majority of the Listed Buildings in the Borough are
in reasonable repair, a 'Buildings at Risk' study, compiled in 1993,
identified a number of Listed Buildings in the Borough which were
in severe disrepair. Action targeted at these buildings has already
started to reduce the number derelict properties. |
| 6.27 |
Schemes such as the Shrewsbury Conservation Area Partnership (CAPS)
offer grants towards the repair of selected historic buildings. These
have proved to be successful in attracting private investment into
Listed Buildings, thus assisting the regeneration of the town centre
through preserving its heritage and improving its image. The Borough
Council will encourage owners of derelict buildings to secure their
repair and re-use by offering assistance in seeking resources for
repairs and refurbishment. If an owner fails to carry out essential
repairs to a Listed Building, the Council will be prepared to use
its powers to secure the repair of the building. The Borough Council
will also consider using its compulsory purchase powers in cases where
owners fail to repair them, so that they may be handed on to new owners
who will carry out the works. |
| 6.28 |
The Council will, in partnership with English Heritage, contribute
towards the maintenance of a 'Buildings at Risk' register and will
encourage owners of buildings on the list to either repair the buildings
or dispose of them to private individuals and commercial concerns
who would be prepared to repair them. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 170 |
| |
|
| |
Where no such interest is shown by others, the Council will encourage
owners to dispose of the buildings at risk to a Building Preservation
Trust (BPT). The Council will encourage the setting up of Building
Preservation Trusts, and encourage existing Preservation Trusts to
acquire 'Buildings at Risk' within the Borough in order to effect
their proper repair and development. Building Preservation Trusts
can attract funding not available to the Council or to private individuals
or commercial concerns. Trusts can be essential partners where Listed
Building Enforcement is being considered as BPTs can enter into joint
arrangements with the Borough Council whereby the Borough Council
can acquire and pass on to a Building Preservation Trust to repair. |
| |
|
| |
STATEMENT |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL SECURE THE RETENTION, REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND
CONTINUED USE OF LISTED BUILDINGS BY:- |
| |
(i) Seeking support and funding from all available sources to
set up grant and repair schemes; |
| |
(ii) Using its powers to take action in the case of derelict
Listed Buildings; |
| |
(iii) Interpreting the Council policies to secure the retention
of buildings of special architectural and historic interest, subject
to reasonable standards of health and safety being ensured; |
| |
(iv) Providing for specialist advice and guidance to owners;
and |
| |
(v) Maintaining and monitoring a Buildings at Risk Register.
|
| |
|
| |
The Statutory List |
| 6.29 |
Buildings are included in the statutory list because of their special
architectural or historic interest. They are graded I, II* or II depending
on their relative importance. Inclusion on the list means that consent
is required for the demolition of a building in whole or in part,
or for any works of alteration or extension, either internal or external,
which would affect its special interest. It is a criminal offence
to carry out works to a Listed Building without consent from the Local
Planning Authority. |
| 6.30 |
Responsibility for keeping the lists up to date lies with the Department
of Culture, Media and Sport who are advised by English Heritage. The
main method of implementing this policy will be by advising the Department
of changes which are considered important and by requesting listing
or regrading |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 171 |
| |
|
| |
where necessary. The Department of Culture, Media and Sport does
add or delete buildings, or upgrade them, from time to time if they
consider it appropriate. The last complete re-survey of Shrewsbury
Town Centre buildings was carried out in 1995, but the lists in the
rural areas of the Borough have not been revised since 1986. |
| |
|
| |
STATEMENT |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL KEEP THE STATUTORY LIST OF BUILDINGS OF SPECIAL
ARCHITECTURAL OR HISTORIC INTEREST UNDER REVIEW AND WILL DRAW ATTENTION
TO BUILDINGS WHICH APPEAR TO MERIT LISTING OR UPGRADING. THE COUNCIL
WILL SERVE BUILDING PRESERVATION NOTICES IN APPROPRIATE CASES. |
| |
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGES THE INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
OF THE FORMER DITHERINGTON FLAX MILL AS THE WORLDS FIRST IRON FRAME,
FIREPROOF BUILDING. CONSTRUCTED IN 1797 AND LISTED (GRADE I) THE COUNCIL
WILL SUPPORT MEASURES TO REGENERATE THIS IMPORTANT GROUP OF BUILDINGS
PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSALS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT
AND OTHER LOCAL PLAN POLICIES. |
| |
|
| 6.31 |
The Department's future priorities will be targeted towards particular
building types which are known to be under-represented in the list.
For example, there is increased emphasis on 20th Century buildings
and industrial buildings forming groups in parks and gardens. |
| |
|
| HE4 DEMOLITION OF
LISTED BUILDINGS |
| PLANNING PERMISSION
OR LISTED BUILDING CONSENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED FOR
DEVELOPMENT WHICH INVOLVES DEMOLITION OF A LISTED
BUILDING, UNLESS THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED:-
|
| (i) |
that exhaustive efforts, over a sustained period
of time, have been made to find an alternative use
for the building, or |
| (ii) |
that the present use cannot continue, or |
| (iii) |
that a proven case has been made that the building
is beyond economic repair, or |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 172 |
| |
|
| (iv) |
that in exceptional circumstances, the re-development
of the site following demolition will bring substantial
benefits to the community when tested against the presumption
in favour of preservation. |
| APPLICATIONS FOR DEMOLITION
MUST CONTAIN FULL JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSALS AND PROVIDE
ALL INFORMATION NECESSARY TO JUDGE THE APPLICATION AGAINST
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, INCLUDING DETAILED PLANS FOR ANY
REDEVELOPMENT: |
| (i) |
Planning permission or listed building consent has been
granted and there is evidence that a contract has been
let for the full implementation of the redevelopment proposals
submitted in support of the application for demolition;
|
| (ii) |
The condition of the building and the cost of repairing
and maintaining it in relation to its importance; |
| (iii) |
The adequacy of efforts made to retain the building
in use; or find a viable new use and demonstrate that
preservation in some form of charitable or community use
is not possible or suitable; |
| (iv) |
That the merits of alternative proposals for the site
would decisively outweigh the loss resulting from demolition
and that redevelopment would produce sustained benefits
to the community. |
| |
CONSENTS MUST BE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS TO ENSURE THAT:
- |
| (i) |
Planning permission or listed building consent has been
granted and there is evidence that a contract has been
let for the full implementation of the redevelopment proposals
submitted in support of the application for demolition;
and |
| (ii) |
Provision is made for the Royal Commission on the Historical
Monuments for England to record the building. |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.32 |
Government advice contained in PPG15 states that there should be
a general presumption in favour of the preservation of listed buildings.
The prime consideration must be to have special regard to the desirability
of preserving the building in its setting or any feature of historic
interest it possesses when assessing applications for demolition. |
| 6.33 |
The destruction of historic buildings is very seldom necessary
for reasons of good planning; more often it is the result of neglect
or of failure to make |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 173 |
| |
|
| |
imaginative efforts to find new uses for them or to incorporate
them into new development. This policy re-affirms the Council's commitment
to the preservation of Listed Buildings throughout the Borough. |
| 6.34 |
In determining applications for demolition of a Listed Building,
the Council cannot grant consent without reference to the Secretary
of State for the Environment. Evidence will be required to show that
applicants have made all reasonable efforts to sustain existing uses
or find viable new uses, and that these efforts have failed, or that
preservation in some form of charitable or community ownership is
not possible or suitable or that redevelopment would produce substantial
benefits for the community which would decisively outweigh the loss
resulting from demolition. |
| 6.35 |
Demolition of a Listed Building, in whole or in part, without consent,
is a criminal offence. |
| 6.36 |
Partial demolition of a Listed Building, for example behind the
front 'facade', will be treated in the same way as total demolition.
Listing protects the whole of a building, it is just the exterior
elevations which are subject to listed building control. In Shrewsbury,
it is not unusual for a late brick facade to conceal a fine mediaeval
or part mediaeval timber frame. |
| 6.37 |
The Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England (RCHM)
must be notified of all proposals to demolish Listed Buildings. The
Commission must be permitted access to buildings which it wishes to
record prior to demolition. Notification may also be required where
radical changes or alterations are proposed to the interior or exterior
of Listed Buildings. |
| |
|
| HE5 ALTERATIONS
TO LISTED BUILDINGS |
| PROPOSALS FOR THE EXTERNAL
OR INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO A LISTED BUILDING OR
FOR THEIR EXTENSION, WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED PROVIDED
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET:- |
| (i) |
the proposals do not adversely affect its architectural
or historic character; |
| (ii) |
applications for such alterations are accompanied
by the full information necessary to assess the
impact of the proposals on the building; |
| (iii) |
works are of a high standard of design in terms
of form, scale, detailing and materials; |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 174 |
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.38 |
Listed buildings are nationally important because they represent
the best of an historic and architectural built heritage. PPG15 describes
them as a "finite resource and an irreplaceable asset". It establishes
a particularly important principle relating to the alteration and
extension of listed buildings and a general presumption in favour
of preservation of listed buildings. |
| 6.39 |
Once buildings are included on the Statutory List of Buildings of
Special Architectural or Historic Interest, then Listed Building Consent
is required to alter, extend, demolish or change the use of a Listed
Building. In granting Listed Building Consent, the Council will take
into account the advice given by the Secretary of State for the Department
of Culture, Media and Sport in Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 (Planning
and the Historic Environment). The granting of Listed Building Consent
in no way removes the requirement to apply for Planning Permission
when it would normally be required. |
| 6.40 |
Before granting consent for alterations to Listed Buildings, the
Council will need to be satisfied that all aspects of the proposal
are justified and that the overall effect of the proposal is not detrimental
to the architectural or historic character of the building. The Council
will also need to be satisfied that the work can be carried out without
danger to the fabric and structure of the building or to adjoining
historic structures. |
| 6.41 |
The implications of complying with other statutory requirements
for example, Building and Fire regulations, will be taken into account
in determining each application. |
| 6.42 |
Plan forms should be retained where they are an integral part of
the architectural layout of the building and so far as possible, all
original features should be retained. Where this is not possible,
careful attention must be given to the details of any replacements.
|
| 6.43 |
Applicants for Listed Building Consent must be able to justify the
proposals. Full plans and elevations showing the proposed development
together with details of adjoining properties and particulars of design,
external appearance, materials and proposed landscaping will be required.
This will allow a proper assessment of the likely impact of the proposal
on the special architectural or historic character of the building.
The guidance on alterations to Listed Buildings in Annex C of PPG15
should be referred to in drawing up proposals. Applicants are advised
to contact the Planning Department at an early stage so that they
may be advised of any special requirements or problems. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 175 |
| |
|
| HE6 NEW USES FOR
LISTED BUILDINGS |
| CHANGE OF USE OF A LISTED BUILDING
WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED IF THE APPLICANT CAN DEMONSTRATE
THAT THE USE PROPOSED AND ANY CONSEQUENT ALTERATIONS
WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE STRUCTURE, CHARACTER
AND APPEARANCE OR SETTING OF THE BUILDING. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.44 |
The best way of securing the future of listed buildings is to keep
them in active use, but this will often necessitate some degree of
adaptation. Judging the best use requires balancing the economic viability
of possible uses against the effect of any changes they entail on
the special architectural or historic interest of the building or
its setting. The optimum viable use compatible with the fabric, interior
and setting of the listed building may not necessarily be the most
profitable. |
| 6.45 |
Whilst the best use will often be the one for which the building
was originally designed, the nature of uses can change over time,
as can the regulations governing them. In some cases, the original
use may be less compatible with the building than the alternative. |
| 6.46 |
The Council is prepared to be flexible in considering new uses
in order to secure a building's survival. PPG15 makes it clear that
the starting point for the exercise of listed building control is
the statutory requirement to have special regard to the desirability
of preserving the building or its setting, or any features of special
architectural or historic interest which it possesses. Insensitive
alterations and extensions can destroy the character which made the
building worthy of listing. |
| 6.47 |
It is essential that alterations to historic buildings necessary
to accommodate a change of use take into account the needs of disabled
people. However, great care will be needed to achieve solutions which
do not detract from the character of the building and the area. Matching
materials and details will help alterations to blend in, but sometimes
alternative access arrangements may have to be considered. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 176 |
| |
| HE7 DEVELOPMENT
AFFECTING THE SETTING OF A LISTED BUILDING
|
| PLANNING PERMISSION WILL ONLY BE GRANTED
FOR DEVELOPMENT WHICH PRESERVES THE SETTING AND
IMPORTANT VIEWS OF LISTED BUILDINGS. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.48 |
Listed Buildings make an important contribution to their surroundings
and are in turn affected by them. The Town and Country Planning (Listed
Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 requires local authorities
to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting
of Listed Buildings when considering development proposals which affect
a Listed Building or its setting. |
| 6.49 |
Where development is proposed, primarily as a way of assisting
the costs of repair of Listed Buildings, that is development known
as "Enabling Development," then the Council believes that there should
be a general presumption against enabling development which does not
meet the following criteria: |
| |
1) The enabling development will not materially detract from the
archaeological, architectural, historic, or landscape interest of
the Listed Building, or materially harm its setting; |
| |
2) The proposal avoids detrimental fragmentation or management
of the Listed Building; |
| |
3) The enabling development will secure the long term future of
the Listed Building, and where applicable , its continued use for
a sympathetic purpose; |
| |
4) The problem arises from the inherent needs of the Listed Building
rather from the circumstances of the present owner or the purchase
price paid; |
| |
5) Financial assistance is not available from any other source;
|
| |
6) It is demonstrated that the amount of enabling development is
the minimum necessary to secure the future of the Listed Building,
and that its form minimises disbenefits; |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 177 |
| |
|
| |
7) The value or benefit of the survival or enhancement of the Listed
Building outweighs the long-term cost to the community (i.e. the disbenefits)
of providing enabling development. |
| |
|
| 6.50 |
Where the Council is of the opinion that a proposal for enabling
development meets all the above criteria, and so on balance is acceptable,
the Council believes that Planning Permission should only be granted
if: |
| |
1. The impact of the development is precisely defined at the outset
, normally through the granting of full rather than outline Planning
Permission; and |
| |
2. The achievement of the repair of the Listed Building is securely
linked to it by means of a Section 106 Agreement in accordance with
the provisions of DOE Circular 1/97; and |
| |
3. The Listed Building is repaired to an agreed standard, or the
funds to do so made available, as early as possible in the course
of the enabling development, ideally at the outset and certainly before
completion or occupation. |
| |
|
| 6.51 |
The setting of a Listed Building is more extensive than its curtilage.
The setting could be its garden, grounds, open space or the general
street scene and, in the case of a particularly prominent building
such as a church with a tower, may cover an extensive area. In such
cases, the siting of buildings, even at some distance, may need careful
consideration in order to protect important views. Under Article 5
of the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO), directions under
Article 4, bringing certain categories of permitted development within
planning control, can be made to bring under control unlisted buildings
within the curtilage of a Listed Building, this is especially important
when dealing with groups of farm buildings. |
| 6.52 |
It is essential to consider the impact of development and other
proposals in the vicinity of Listed Buildings. Development proposals
will be given careful appraisal to ensure that the harmony produced
by particular groupings of buildings and the quality of the spaces
and views between them is not adversely affected. The preservation
of nearby trees and landscape features and close control over the
quality of design of new development in close proximity to a Listed
Building will be essential to protect its setting. |
| |
|
| |
Conservation Areas |
| 6.53 |
Conservation Areas provide attractive places to live and work and
contribute to the quality of life for local people. Such areas are
also attractive to visitors and help to promote a positive image of
the Borough, encouraging new investment and tourism. Conservation
Areas are defined in the Planning |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 178 |
| |
|
| |
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 as areas of special
architectural or historical interest, the character or appearance
of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. The Council has a
duty under the Act to review designations from time to time and has
taken the opportunity to carry out this review as part of the Development
Plan process. |
| 6.54 |
The Council intends to: |
| |
· Identify further areas which could be considered for Conservation
Area status; |
| |
· Review existing boundaries to take account of current guidelines
and changes which have taken place within those areas; |
| |
· Enhance the character or appearance of Conservation Areas where
possible; |
| |
· Provide a framework for the preparation of more detailed 'character
statements' for each Conservation Area. |
| |
|
| 6.55 |
In reviewing existing Conservation Areas and considering new ones,
consistent standards must be applied, only areas of demonstrable quality
should be designated. Deciding which areas are of special architectural
or historic interest is a matter of judgement informed by locally
based criteria. The quality and interest of a whole area must be considered,
not just individual buildings. A typical assessment would normally
consider some or all of the following: |
| |
· Topographical development of the area, including ancient street
patterns, planned layouts, historic land uses and relationship of
buildings to open spaces; |
| |
· Archaeological interest, including scheduled monuments or other
recorded sites; buildings of architectural or historic quality and
character or social interest; |
| |
· Townscape and landscape value, including open spaces, trees and
other natural features and the built fabric of the area including
views into and out of the area; |
| |
· Building materials and details typical of a particular locality,
period or prevalent building type, and traditional paving materials
and patterns. |
| |
|
| 6.56 |
Areas of Special Architectural or Historic Interest can be damaged
by the loss of original features, the intrusion of alien development
or poor repair. The impact of such negative elements will be taken
into account in determining |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 179 |
| |
|
| |
whether designation, extension or de-designation is appropriate.
However, the existence of negative elements within an area of otherwise
special interest will not necessarily mean that designation is not
appropriate. Designation can be a stimulus to regeneration and may
allow resources to be brought to bear on the area's problems, bringing
economic and social benefits as well as enhancing its character and
appearance. |
| 6.57 |
Since 1974, the Council has designated 17 Conservation Areas. These
are:
1. Belle Vue
2. Harlescott
3. Meole Brace
4. Shrewsbury Conservation Area
(designated in 1974 and extended 1981 & 1997)
5. The Mount, Shrewsbury
6. Acton Burnell
7. Alberbury
8. Astley
9. Cardington
10. Church Pulverbatch
11. Condover
12. Ford
13. Habberley
14. Harley
15. Plealey
16. Westbury
17. Upton Magna |
| 6.58 |
A Conservation Area Assessment has been prepared for a number of
the Character Areas within the Town Centre Conservation Area:
1. The Quarry
2. Abbey Foregate
3. Coleham
4. Mountfields
5. Frankwell & New Street
6. Castlefields and Spring Gardens. |
| |
Further Assessments will be made of the following rural settlements.
1. Asterley
2. Bayston Hill
3. Longnor
4. Minsterley
5. Picklescott
6. Pitchford Village |
| 6.59 |
Designation or extension will be based on an assessment of the
character as set out in this policy and will be subject to local consultation.
The majority of recent designations have been village centres. There
are still parts of the urban fabric of Shrewsbury which may be worthy
of designation, including areas to the north of the town which relate
to the industrial heritage of Shrewsbury. The Council's approach to
conservation is to consult local people on the merits of designation
and to take their views into account. Where a decision is made to
proceed with formal designation, an explanatory booklet is produced
which sets out the policies to be applied and gives an appraisal of
the area's character and historical development. |
| 6.60 |
The Council, Following the advice contained in Paragraphs 4.21-4.24
of Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 (PPG 15) has after full consultation
and support of residents, made use of its powers under the GDO to
remove certain permitted development rights by the use of Article
4 Directions. The Council will continue to apply this policy where
there is demonstrable public/residential support for such action.
The withdrawal of permitted development rights would not be sought
without a Conservation Area Assessment and a comprehensive public
consultation prior to any approval by the Council. The Council also
believes that it has a duty, from time to time to review Conservation
Area boundaries and to apply Article 4 Directions where there is a
clear justification and public support and where not to do so would
constitute a clear threat to the character and appearance of the Conservation
Area. |
| |
|
| |
STATEMENT |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL REVIEW THE BOUNDARIES OF EXISTING CONSERVATION
AREAS, MAKE FURTHER DESIGNATIONS WHERE APPROPRIATE AND CARRY OUT AN
ASSESSMENT OF THE SPECIAL INTEREST OF EACH AREA. ARTICLE 4 DIRECTIONS
WILL BE IMPOSED TO CONTROL PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE.
|
| |
|
| |
Preservation and Enhancement of Conservation Areas
|
| 6.61 |
Proposals for preservation and enhancement may take many forms,
for example, some areas require no more than effective development
control to protect their character, while others may require a more
pro-active approach to solve existing problems. The Council will continue
to monitor the enhancement needs of Conservation Areas and prepare
programmes for regeneration and improvement, such as the Shrewsbury
Conservation Area Partnership or the Visual Enhancement Scheme. |
| 6.62 |
A key component of a positive approach to conservation is the use
of limited grant aid to secure the proper repair of Listed Buildings
and buildings in |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 181 |
| |
|
| |
Conservation Areas. The cost of repairing these buildings can often
place a considerable burden on owners and it is quite often greater
than that of ordinary buildings. |
| 6.63 |
The Borough Council can assist in the process of repair and regeneration
by seeking funds from private and central government sources and by
making funds available itself as resources permit. Schemes such as
the Shrewsbury Conservation Area Partnership have proved successful
in attracting investment into the Town Centre Conservation Area and
contribute towards the economic development of the Borough. |
| 6.64 |
A plethora of signs and clutter can significantly detract from the
appearance of a Conservation Area, and where appropriate, the Council
will issue discontinuance orders to secure the removal of existing
signs which are detrimental to the character and appearance of a Conservation
Area. The Council will pursue appropriate action against unauthorised
alterations to buildings in Conservation Areas which results in damage
to the character and appearance of the area. |
| 6.65 |
Where they do not already exist, character assessments will be
prepared for each Conservation Area and additional planning guidance
in the form of leaflets on individual Conservation Areas will be produced
and updated where currently existing. These will provide detailed
information on the reasons for an area's designation and its special
features and set down the principles for the preservation and enhancement
of its character. PPG15 emphasises that principles identifying why
an area should be preserved or enhanced will almost always need to
be developed. |
| |
|
| |
STATEMENT |
| |
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL WILL TAKE POSITIVE ACTION TO SECURE THE
PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF CONSERVATION AREAS AND WILL: |
| |
(i) Seek support and funding from all available sources for the
repair of buildings and environmental improvements; |
| |
(ii) Prepare action plans for priority areas; |
| |
(iii) Use its available powers to secure the removal of features
which significantly detract from the character of the area; and |
| |
(iv) Provide planning policy guidance and advice to owners and
developers. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 182 |
| |
|
| |
Consultation with Amenity Groups and Conservation
Bodies |
| 6.66 |
Listed Building and Conservation Area legislation requires that
English Heritage together with five national Amenity Societies are
consulted where there are applications to demolish listed buildings.
A sixth society, the Twentieth Century Society is notified by the
Victorian Society of relevant applications. Where there are applications
affecting the site or setting of Historic Parks and Gardens, the Council
will also seek the views of the Garden History Society . The Council
also has a duty to notify English Heritage of applications affecting
Grade I and Grade II* Registered Parks and Gardens. Where there are
major applications with major design implications, the Council may
also consult The Council for Architecture and the Built Environment
(CABE). At the local level, the Council will also seek the views of
Local Amenity Groups, such as the Shropshire Society of Architects,
the Shrewsbury Civic Trust, and other representative amenity groups
through the Development Services Liaison Group. |
| |
|
| HE8 NEW DEVELOPMENT
IN OR ADJACENT TO CONSERVATION AREAS |
| IN OR ADJACENT TO A
CONSERVATION AREA, PLANNING PERMISSION WILL ONLY
BE GRANTED FOR DEVELOPMENT WHICH PRESERVES OR ENHANCES
ITS CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE. APPLICATIONS MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY FULL INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ASSESS
THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSALS ON THE AREA, INCLUDING
DETAILS OF DESIGN, MATERIALS AND LANDSCAPING. PROPOSALS
WILL BE EXPECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
TO: |
| (i) |
Be of a high standard of design, use materials
appropriate to its setting and context and respect
the character and appearance of the Conservation
Area; |
| (ii) |
Pay special attention to conserving the essential
elements which combine to give the area its special
character and avoid changes which would detract
from the character and appearance of the area; |
| (iii) |
Preserve important views and vistas within, into
and out of the Conservation Area including vistas
and views from outside the boundary of the Conservation
Area or adjacent to and affecting the setting of
the Conservation Area; |
| (iv) |
Avoid the loss of open space or landscape features,
including trees and hedges important to the character
of the area; |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 183 |
| |
|
| (v) |
Avoid generating levels of traffic, parking, noise or
environmental problems of detriment to the character or
appearance of the area; and |
| (vi) |
Have satisfactory means of access and provide for car
parking in a manner sympathetic to the appearance of the
Conservation Area. |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.67 |
The Council recognises the need to pay special attention to the
preservation or enhancement of the character or appearance of Conservation
Areas. In practice, this does not take the form of preventing all
new development. The emphasis must be on the controlled management
of change 'in context' where alterations, adaptation of existing buildings
and the creation of new buildings is sympathetic in design, scale
and use of materials within the existing character of the Conservation
Area. Conservation means breathing new life into old buildings, sometimes
by restoration, sometimes by sensitive development and sometimes by
adaptation to a new use. |
| 6.68 |
It is essential that new work is of the highest possible standard.
Ideally, it should become as valued in the future as the best historic
buildings are today. It follows that new development should not just
be a pastiche of the old. Good contemporary design is to be welcomed,
but should respond to and respect the integrity of the building's
appearance and character. This involves retaining such features as
the original internal layout and important architectural elements
in the design. |
| 6.69 |
PPG15 now advises planning authorities to assess the impact of development
proposals adjacent to Conservation Areas. The desirability of preserving
or enhancing the Conservation Area should also be a material consideration
in the handling of development proposals which are outside the designated
area, but which would affect its setting, or views into or out of
the area. |
| 6.70 |
Many Conservation Areas contain gap sites or buildings which make
no contribution to, or detract from, its character and appearance.
Redevelopment of these should stimulate high quality design and be
seen as an opportunity to enhance the area. New buildings do not have
to imitate earlier buildings, but should be designed with respect
for their situation. |
| 6.71 |
Good design need not necessarily be expensive. Development should
be appropriate to its location, with special regard given to such
matters as scale, height, form, massing, respect for traditional pattern
of frontages, vertical or horizontal emphasis, local materials and
detailed design (e.g. the scale and spacing of window openings). |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 184 |
| |
|
| HE9 DEMOLITION OF
BUILDINGS IN CONSERVATION AREAS |
| WHERE A PROPOSAL FOR
DEVELOPMENT WOULD INVOLVE THE DEMOLITION OF AN UNLISTED
BUILDING IN A CONSERVATION AREA, THE COUNCIL WILL
HAVE REGARD TO THE ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORIC CONTRIBUTION
OF THE EXISTING BUILDING IN CONSIDERING WHETHER
THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WOULD PRESERVE OR ENHANCE
THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE CONSERVATION
AREA. |
| CONSERVATION AREA CONSENT
FOR THE DEMOLITION OF A BUILDING IN A CONSERVATION
AREA WILL NOT BE GRANTED IF THE BUILDING MAKES A
POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE
OF THE AREA. IF A BUILDING MAKES NO POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION,
CONSERVATION AREA CONSENT WILL BE GRANTED ONLY IF
THERE ARE ACCEPTABLE DETAILED PROPOSALS FOR THE
RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.72 |
Specific consent must be obtained for the demolition of buildings
in Conservation Areas. PPG15 affirms that the general presumption
should be in favour of the preservation and retention of buildings
and structures which make a positive contribution to the character
and appearance of the Conservation Area. Proposals to demolish such
buildings will be assessed against the same broad criteria as proposals
to demolish Listed Buildings. |
| 6.73 |
In assessing whether buildings which are not listed make a positive
contribution to the special architectural character or historic interest
of a Conservation Area, the following criteria will be taken into
account, as advised by English Heritage in their 'Conservation Area
Practice Note' 1995:- |
| 6.74 |
Whether the building or structure: |
| |
· has qualities of age, style, materials or characteristics common
to other buildings in the Conservation Area; |
| |
· relates by age, materials or other historically significant way
to adjacent Listed Buildings, and contributes positively to their
setting; |
| |
· individually or as part of a group, illustrates the gradual development
of the settlement in which it stands, or of an earlier phase of growth; |
| |
· has a significant historic association with established features
such as the road layout, or with local people or events; |
| |
· has a landmark quality, or contributes to the quality of recognisable
spaces; |
| |
· reflects the traditional functional character of, or former uses
within, the area; |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
| Page 185 |
| |
|
| |
· when associated with a designated landscape, such as walls, terracing,
or a minor garden building, is of identifiable importance to the historic
design. |
| 6.75 |
Any one of these characteristics could provide the basis for deciding
that a building makes a positive contribution to the special interest
of a Conservation Area, provided that its historic form and qualities
have not been seriously eroded by unsympathetic alteration. PPG15
also advises that where a building makes little or no contribution
to the character of an area, the local planning authority still needs
full information about what is proposed for a site after demolition.
Consent should not be given without acceptable and detailed plans
for redevelopment. More information on the requirements on new developments
in Conservation Areas is given under Policy HE8. |
| 6.76 |
Where a building makes little or no contribution to the character
of the Conservation Area, proposals for demolition will be considered
in the light of the alternative proposal for the site and the contribution
made to preserving or enhancing the character of the Conservation
Area. |
| 6.77 |
In all cases, applications must be accompanied by all information
necessary to assess the application against the above criteria, including
fully detailed plans for redevelopment. |
| |
|
| HE10 SHOPFRONTS
ON LISTED BUILDINGS AND IN CONSERVATION AREAS
|
| A NEW SHOPFRONT, OR
REPLACEMENT, OR ALTERATION TO A SHOP FRONT, WILL
ONLY BE PERMITTED IF: |
| (i) |
it is sensitively designed, in relation to the
building and surroundings, through the use of suitable
materials with due attention paid to scale and proportion;
|
| (ii) |
security shutters are not located on the exterior
of the shopfront; |
| (iii) |
fascia and hanging signs are in keeping with
the character and appearance of the shop front and
building in terms of size and design; |
| (iv) |
independent access to upper floors is preserved.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Reasoned Justification |
| 6.78 |
Shopfronts may be regarded as transient features, but wherever
they are of architectural or historic merit, it is important that
they are retained and |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |